Wednesday, July 10, 2013

The Cost Disease by William Baumol


   Why do certain things like computers get cheaper, while others like education continue to get more expensive? In The Cost Disease, William Baumol explains why this happens and what it means for society. He is clearly one of the leaders of thought in this topic as the disease is named after him. In essence, Baumol discovered that fields in which there can be little labor productivity growth, due to the fact that they are services that require personal attention, prices will continually rise higher than the rate of inflation. Conversely, computers, for which production can continuously be more and more automated, will continue to get cheaper. In short summary, lets say inflation, which by definition means that the purchasing power of money declines, makes prices rise by 5%. Since some sectors are having prices rising significantly under 5%, other sectors will have prices rise to be above that line. The reason this happens to sectors that are in the service business, is because they cannot make their production cheaper, but must still give wages to be competitive for workers. 
     While this was an interesting point in economics, Baumol's "solution" to the problem is enlightening. Since many sectors, such as food and technology have become cheaper they enable us to spend a greater percentage of our wealth on services, like health care. Therefore, even if health prices continue to rise, we, as a society, can continue to pay for it and still have our lives be better off in the long run. The question for the Orthodox Jewish community would be, does this rosy future apply to us as well? For years the Orthodox Jewish community has spoken about a "tuition crisis" (I put it in quotation marks because we need to stop calling everything a crisis, even if it is something that must be dealt with as soon as we find a viable solution. Calling everything a crisis makes problems seem like they are ephemeral concepts). Since, at least in general, we send our children to Jewish private schools starting in 1st grade, the continuous increase in prices has continued to create a strain on the community (they have risen to about 20K a year per child). However, perhaps, as the book would argue would be true in general, we will continually be better off despite the fact that education is taking up a greater and greater percentage of our livelihoods. If our community was like all others I would have to assume that it would be true, and perhaps it is. However, I think there are two reasons why we are not in the position to sit on our laurels and assume that the "tuition crisis" is truly a problem despite it looking like "the cost disease". Firstly, we are paying for education both for ourselves that is ever increasing, while also separately paying ever increasing costs for public education, which many of us do not directly use. Secondly, many of the sectors that in general are part of the progressive sector, fall into the service sector in our community. The most glaring one is meat. The slaughtering of meat needs to be done in a personal way by a qualified individual, and it is therefore now unsurprising to me, based on your thesis, that the price of Kosher meat continues to rise. Rather than pretending I can answer if we are truly in a predicament or it just seems like a problem like the cost disease does, I decided to ask Dr. Baumol himself. He answered: 
"Dear Mr. Reinstein, Thank you very much for your illuminating message.  Since I too am Jewish (though not orthodox), I am particularly concerned about the issue you raise.  And, indeed, though my analysis does, I believe, apply to the community as a whole, it unfortunately does not imply that all groups of society will have their legitimate interests protected. These are certainly matters that will require careful analysis and the design of appropriate remedial measures.  I will certainly seek to think further about the problem you raise.  
With best wishes,
Will Baumol"
First of all, it is awesome that he is Jewish, considering the impact he has had in recent economics. Also he answered remarkably quickly, which I was not expecting, but was extremely nice. In any event I hope he does continue to think about the problem because, after reading his book, would be very confident in possibilities he may bring up.  If it is a problem, I hope we, as a community, can solve it, or at least mitigate it soon.